Several sites,
a single view.
When production is spread across multiple centers, the difficulty is no longer technical but organizational: knowing what is happening everywhere, being able to transfer a title without improvising, and maintaining common rules without constraining each site.
PROFILE
Multiple titles, multiple sites
CONSTRAINT
Governance and rights by title
BRICKS
Multi-tenant flow · monitoring · cloud
VIEW
Each with their own scope, management with the whole
01 — Your constraints
Three governance questions.
01
Compare sites
Without common indicators, it is impossible to know if a center is actually performing worse or simply under a heavier workload. The discussion remains based on subjective feelings.
02
Transfer a title
A press breakdown, a strike, a peak: you need to be able to print elsewhere that very evening. This requires a well-oiled page transfer process and already-aligned parameters.
03
To uphold a common rule
The same title should not come out differently depending on the center. Shared profiles are needed, while leaving each site the latitude that its press requires.
02 — What we put in front
Multi-site, brick by brick.
A multi-tenant flow
One instance, multiple titles and multiple sites, with separate access rights. Each person sees their own scope, management sees the whole picture, without multiplying the number of servers.
Workflow ↗
Comparable indicators
The same metrics everywhere, tracked over time. This is what turns an operations meeting into a factual discussion rather than a defense of territory.
Supervision ↗
The transfer between centers
Arkitex Courier transmits pages from one site to another with acknowledgment and crash recovery. Remote operations are prepared once and run without a crisis meeting.
Page swaps ↗
The cloud as a foundation
For a multi-site network, centralized hosting solves the issues of versioning, backups, and recovery all at once. It is often the perfect time to make the switch.
Cloud & hosted ↗
A heterogeneous fleet is managed on a site-by-site basis.
It is rare for groups to have all their centers running on the same version. We start by mapping out the existing setup, and then we propose a site-by-site transition plan rather than a single, massive roll-out.
Request a mapping ↗